Andreas Hoenen <andr...@hoenen-terstappen.de> wrote: > Andreas Hoenen <andr...@hoenen-terstappen.de> wrote: > > > Anders Kaseorg <ande...@mit.edu> wrote: > > > > > Package: dblatex > > > Version: 0.3.8-1 > > > Severity: grave > > > > > > dblatex in sid fails on every document as follows: > > > > Hi Benoît, > > > > I want to notify you about Debian BTS report #840189 [1], indicating > > that dblatex doesn't work together with the new version of multirow.sty > > [2]: > > Hi Benoît, > > the attached hotfix [1] seems to resolve the incompatibility between > dblatex and the new multirow.sty version. > > However avoiding to call the \@xmultirow macro if it an internal one > would be a cleaner solution. >
Hi Benoît,
is the problematic paragraph labeled "% Make \@xmultirow long" in
dbk_table.sty *needed at all* within current dblatex? I can't find any
calls of the \@xmultirow macro within dblatex, and after commenting out
the paragraph a DocBook example with a table containing multirows still
is transformed to PDF without errors and looks as expected.
Eliminating this paragraph from dbk_table.sty seems to be cleaner, more
robust and future-proof than my previous hotfix candidate.
What do you think?
Regards, Andreas
--
Andreas Hoenen <andr...@hoenen-terstappen.de>
GPG: 1024D/B888D2CE
A4A6 E8B5 593A E89B 496B
82F0 728D 8B7E B888 D2CE
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
