Andreas Hoenen <andr...@hoenen-terstappen.de> wrote: > Anders Kaseorg <ande...@mit.edu> wrote: > > > Package: dblatex > > Version: 0.3.8-1 > > Severity: grave > > > > dblatex in sid fails on every document as follows: > > Hi Benoît, > > I want to notify you about Debian BTS report #840189 [1], indicating > that dblatex doesn't work together with the new version of multirow.sty > [2]:
Hi Benoît, the attached hotfix [1] seems to resolve the incompatibility between dblatex and the new multirow.sty version. However avoiding to call the \@xmultirow macro if it an internal one would be a cleaner solution. What do you think? [1]
Author: Andreas Hoenen <andr...@hoenen-terstappen.de>
Description: hotfix for BTS report #840189:
Adapt to signature change of \@xmultirow macro (between texlive-latex-extra
versions 2016.20160819-1 and 2016.20161008-1).
--- a/latex/style/dbk_table.sty
+++ b/latex/style/dbk_table.sty
@@ -24,12 +24,13 @@
% Make \@xmultirow long
\expandafter\long\expandafter\def%
\expandafter\@xmultirow%
-\expandafter#\expandafter1%
-\expandafter[\expandafter#\expandafter2\expandafter]%
-\expandafter#\expandafter3%
-\expandafter[\expandafter#\expandafter4\expandafter]%
-\expandafter#\expandafter5%
-\expandafter{\@xmultirow{#1}[#2]{#3}[#4]{#5}}
+\expandafter[\expandafter#\expandafter1\expandafter]%
+\expandafter#\expandafter2%
+\expandafter[\expandafter#\expandafter3\expandafter]%
+\expandafter#\expandafter4%
+\expandafter[\expandafter#\expandafter5\expandafter]%
+\expandafter#\expandafter6%
+\expandafter{\@xmultirow[#1]{#2}[#3]{#4}[#5]{#6}}
% For the newtbl code
\newdimen\newtblstarfactor%
Regards, Andreas
--
Andreas Hoenen <andr...@hoenen-terstappen.de>
GPG: 1024D/B888D2CE
A4A6 E8B5 593A E89B 496B
82F0 728D 8B7E B888 D2CE
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
