On 04/08/16 21:41, James Cowgill wrote: > Hi, > > On 04/08/16 18:02, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On Sat, 23 Jul 2016 13:30:19 +0200 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> >> wrote: >>> On 23/07/16 12:40, James Cowgill wrote: >>>> Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/gpac/gpac/issues/592 >>>> >>>> On Thu, 2016-07-21 at 19:12 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 09 Jun 2016 10:30:01 +0200 "Mathieu Malaterre" <ma...@debian.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> This is a continued operation since src:jasper removal for stretch >>>>>> release. >>>>>> >>>>>> src:openjpeg will be removed from Debian for the stretch release >>>>>> (and following that, the archive in general). For more information >>>>>> see: http://bugs.debian.org/826805 >>>>>> >>>>>> It has been superseeded by src:openjpeg2 >>>>>> >>>>>> Your package uses src:openjpeg, so please either remove the >>>>>> JPEG2000 functionality or move to the new API. >>>>> >>>>> Ping? It looks like your package already uses libjpeg-turbo. Can we >>>>> just drop the openjpeg support? If not, can you forward this >>>>> upstream? This is the last key package still depending on openjpeg, >>>>> and it is going to block its removal from Stretch. >>>> >>>> I've forwarded the bug, but are there any objections to removing >>>> openjpeg support in the meantime? There doesn't seem to be any users of >>>> the openjpeg support in other Debian packages at least. >>> >>> That'd be good in order to finish the transition. But I don't use gpac. >> >> Can that be done? > > Thanks for reminding me, I totally forgot about this. I'll do it in a > few minutes.
Thanks! Emilio
