Hi, On 04/08/16 18:02, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On Sat, 23 Jul 2016 13:30:19 +0200 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> > wrote: >> On 23/07/16 12:40, James Cowgill wrote: >>> Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/gpac/gpac/issues/592 >>> >>> On Thu, 2016-07-21 at 19:12 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>>> On Thu, 09 Jun 2016 10:30:01 +0200 "Mathieu Malaterre" <ma...@debian.org> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> This is a continued operation since src:jasper removal for stretch >>>>> release. >>>>> >>>>> src:openjpeg will be removed from Debian for the stretch release >>>>> (and following that, the archive in general). For more information >>>>> see: http://bugs.debian.org/826805 >>>>> >>>>> It has been superseeded by src:openjpeg2 >>>>> >>>>> Your package uses src:openjpeg, so please either remove the >>>>> JPEG2000 functionality or move to the new API. >>>> >>>> Ping? It looks like your package already uses libjpeg-turbo. Can we >>>> just drop the openjpeg support? If not, can you forward this >>>> upstream? This is the last key package still depending on openjpeg, >>>> and it is going to block its removal from Stretch. >>> >>> I've forwarded the bug, but are there any objections to removing >>> openjpeg support in the meantime? There doesn't seem to be any users of >>> the openjpeg support in other Debian packages at least. >> >> That'd be good in order to finish the transition. But I don't use gpac. > > Can that be done?
Thanks for reminding me, I totally forgot about this. I'll do it in a few minutes. James
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
