On 02/17/2015 11:11 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Completely disagree: unetbootin is the tool of choice to create
> bootable images for a variety of distributions, so shipping it
> with Debian is correct, for those distributions. Just that the
> software should not be used for creating broken *Debian* images.
> That is something to be fixed upstream, because the person using
> it for such is typically *not* running Debian.
I think you missed the part where I was talking about non-Debian
images. It clearly breaks non-Debian images as well, for example
FreeDOS. Just look at the bug tracker with almost 300 bugs:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unetbootin
It's completely broken and just produces headaches for both users
and developers. I don't know why something that is so broken should
be a "tool of choice". What's the point in shipping unetbootin
when half of the boot media it creates are not working properly?
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
