On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 16:50:54 +0100, intrigeri wrote: > But anyway, for Jessie+1 I'll add shlibs support, so indeed this check > will be redundant; and then, my understanding is that it'll also > become fully harmless. > It'd be better if this didn't wait until jessie+1. Please let me know off-list if you'd like help on this. (and no, it won't be harmless)
Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
