Hi Mehdi Dogguy <me...@dogguy.org> writes:
> Le 2014-10-09 22:55, Gaudenz Steinlin a écrit : >> >> I will certainly update the Conflict if we can't agree on a better >> solution in the next few days. But as the Conflict was a workaround >> from >> the begining I'd prefer a solution where we agree on different names >> for >> the commands instead. >> > > I very much agree with what you say, but I think it is rather late to > find > a stable name (where also upstream is confortable with) in time for > Jessie. > There are only a few days left before the freeze. > > For that reason, I prefer to keep the old (and not so nice) workaround > and > work on a better solution to implement in Jessie+1. I've now uploaded a package with the conflict updated to slurm-client. But I would still like to hear from the slurm maintainers and from Jürgen Rinas (sinfo upstream and Debian co-maintainer) about the possibility of renameing one of the commands. I would still very much prefer that solution. Gaudenz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
