Mehdi Dogguy <me...@dogguy.org> writes: > Hi Gaudenz, > > On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 10:34:45AM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin > <gaud...@debian.org> wrote: >> >> Ralf Treinen <trei...@free.fr> writes: >> >> > Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages >> > (according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be >> > slightly out of sync): >> > >> > /usr/bin/sinfo >> > /usr/share/man/man1/sinfo.1.gz >> >> This happends because the sinfo binary in slurm moved from slurm-llnl to >> slurm-client and now the conflict specified in sinfo is wrong. To >> restore the previous state, sinfo should update it's conflict to >> slurm-client with appropriate versioning. >> > > Since your package had a Conflicts, can you please update it? If you agree > on that, can you also reassign this bug to src:sinfo so that it is tracked > properly?
I will certainly update the Conflict if we can't agree on a better solution in the next few days. But as the Conflict was a workaround from the begining I'd prefer a solution where we agree on different names for the commands instead. The conflict is especially bad as the packages are not just two completely unrelated pieces of software but a cluster monitoring software and a cluster resource manager and job scheduler. I can very well imagine that people want to install both on the same system. Gaudenz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
