Control: unblock -1 by 759794 On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 13:39:27 +0200 Gilles Filippini <p...@debian.org> wrote: > Control: block -1 by 759794 > > Gilles Filippini a écrit , Le 31/08/2014 12:59: > > Gilles Filippini a écrit , Le 31/08/2014 11:04: > >> Hi Yaroslav, > >> > >> Yaroslav Halchenko a écrit , Le 31/08/2014 02:17: > >>> both ants and nifti2dicom (and probably others) recent FTBFS are due to > >>> recentish upload of hdf5 1.8.13+docs-8 which was previously only in > >>> experimental after its big RF in (1.8.13+docs-1) which stopped providing > >>> '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhdf5.so' but provides separate builds for > >>> each flavor: > >>> > >>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/hdf5/mpich/libhdf5.so libhdf5-mpich-dev > >>> [amd64] > >>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/hdf5/openmpi/libhdf5.so libhdf5-openmpi-dev > >>> [amd64] > >>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/hdf5/serial/libhdf5.so libhdf5-dev [amd64] > >>> > >>> Gilles, I wondered, shouldn't there still be a > >>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhdf*.so* managed via alternatives, e.g. like > >>> blas/atlas do it? > >> > >> I didn't spot ants as a rdep oh hdf5. I'll have a look. > >> About nifti2dicom, my previous tests reported no FTBFS after binNMUing > >> vtk6. I'll have a look as well. > > > > It seems the FindITK.cmake macro reports the wrong path for hdf5 > > libraries. Still investigating... > > It needs insighttoolkit4 beeing binNMUed. This is blocked by #759794 > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=759794
insighttoolkit4 was binNMUed for amd64. ants and nifti2dicom shouldn't FTBFS anymore. Thanks, _g. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
