Hi Yaroslav, Yaroslav Halchenko a écrit , Le 31/08/2014 02:17: > both ants and nifti2dicom (and probably others) recent FTBFS are due to > recentish upload of hdf5 1.8.13+docs-8 which was previously only in > experimental after its big RF in (1.8.13+docs-1) which stopped providing > '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhdf5.so' but provides separate builds for > each flavor: > > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/hdf5/mpich/libhdf5.so libhdf5-mpich-dev [amd64] > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/hdf5/openmpi/libhdf5.so libhdf5-openmpi-dev > [amd64] > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/hdf5/serial/libhdf5.so libhdf5-dev [amd64] > > Gilles, I wondered, shouldn't there still be a > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhdf*.so* managed via alternatives, e.g. like > blas/atlas do it?
I didn't spot ants as a rdep oh hdf5. I'll have a look. About nifti2dicom, my previous tests reported no FTBFS after binNMUing vtk6. I'll have a look as well. There shouldn't be a need for alternatives anyway. Thanks for the notice, _g.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature