On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 03:50:13PM +0100, James Cowgill wrote: > On Sat, 2014-08-16 at 09:19 -0500, Paul Elliott wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 06:44:48AM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > > > On Sat, 16 Aug 2014, Olly Betts wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >I've NMUed wxsqlite3 to unstable, so please upload maitreya. > > > > > > > > > > I built the package in a freshly updated unstable pbuilder but its linked > > > against libwxsqlite3-3.0-0. Is that right or have I in fact not got the > > > latest packages? > > > > I am investigating this now but is that not correct? > > As I look at https://packages.debian.org/ I find that > > source package > > http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/w/wxsqlite3/wxsqlite3_3.1.0~dfsg1-1.1.dsc > > http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/w/wxsqlite3/wxsqlite3_3.1.0~dfsg1.orig.tar.bz2 > > http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/w/wxsqlite3/wxsqlite3_3.1.0~dfsg1-1.1.debian.tar.xz > > > > produces the binary packages: > > libwxsqlite3-3.0-0 (3.1.0~dfsg1-1.1) > > libwxsqlite3-3.0-dev (3.1.0~dfsg1-1.1) > > > > That is also how it was when these were in experimantal. > > These are the correct packages, the name of the package wasn't changed > when wxsqlite3 just got updated. The package name corresponds to: > libwxsqlite3 = as in sqlite version 3 > -3.0 = version of wxwidgets > -0 = soversion > > > When I attempt to apt-get these 2 packages, this is what > > happened:
> Version 3.1.0~dfsg1-2 doesn't exist, maybe you built it yourself? Try > downgrading it to the version in unstable first. > > James Ok that problem was my fault. The 3.0 binaries correspond to the 3.1 source. The new maitreya is designed to use the new binaries. I believe everything is OK. -- Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096 pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX 78758-3117
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
