On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Osamu Aoki <osamu_aoki_h...@nifty.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 02:14:49PM -0400, Guo Yixuan wrote: > > The only problem for using uversionmangle is: > > > > I: librime source: > > debian-watch-file-should-dversionmangle-not-uversionmangle line 3 > > N: > > N: The version of this package contains dfsg, ds, or debian, but a > > N: misleading upstream version mangling occurs in the debian/watch file. > > N: Since the dfsg string is not part of the upstream version and its > > N: addition is Debian-specific, the the debian/watch file should use the > > N: dversionmangle option to remove, instead of adding in uversionmangle, > > N: the dfsg before comparing version numbers. > > N: > > N: Refer to http://wiki.debian.org/DEHS for details. > > N: > > N: Severity: wishlist, Certainty: certain > > N: > > N: Check: watch-file, Type: source > > > > But if we use dversionmangle instead of uversionmangle, > > then the renamed origin tarball has name "librime_1.1.orig.tar.gz", > > which needs to be manually renamed to "librime_1.1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz". > > > > A related bug is here. [1] > > > > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=748465 > > Did you try the solution at the bottom?
Do you mean message #42? I can't find any solutions there... I think a lintian override is the best solution before the removal of debian-watch-file-should-dversionmangle-not-uversionmangle. [1 #42] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=748465#42 > Also, adding yourself to uploader, go ahead. This means you will stay > with us and keep working on this :-) Thank you! Cheers, Yixuan
