Hi, On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 01:45:32AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote: > On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 1:33 AM, GUO Yixuan <culu....@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm just waiting for a confirmation on the librime-dev => librime1-dev > > renaming, from Aron, as we discussed in a previous thread. [1] > > > > As said before, I don't have strong opinion on either way.
My popsition is that you have not presented enough reason to do this. So do not do this. > > In addition, because the symbol files are not useful, should we create > > a shlibs file? > > > > [1] > > https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ime-devel/2014-May/004168.html > > > > Don't think it's so useful nowadays, either use symbols or don't use > anything in normal cases. Hmmm... I think if we drop the symbol file, packaging tool chain automatically generates the shlibs file. Please look into your generated binary package to verify :-) I see it there. I suggest you to add the following at the top of debian/rules file if you have not. I am doing this for all my new upload (see ibus). # See dpkg-buildflags(1) DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS = 1 include /usr/share/dpkg/default.mk #export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -Wall -pedantic export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -Wl,--as-needed This also helps you to test build consistently etc. This is good idea for the newer dpkg(>1.16.1). See explantion in the EXAMPLES section of dpkg-buildflags(1) manpage. Regards, Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
