Hi all, On 01/10/2014 02:21 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi, > > Adding Paul Brossier to CC, since he maintains aubio and uploaded the > version with the API bump. Paul, please see/comment Adrian's mail below. > > From my point of view (i.e. with my release hat on), I am fine with > either resolution the two of you come up with as long as the build > failure here is resolved and aubio's transition is finished. > > ~Niels > > On 2014-01-09 15:28, Adrian Knoth wrote: >> On 01/02/14 19:27, Niels Thykier wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >>> Package: ardour3 >>> Version: 3.5.143~dfsg-1 >>> Severity: serious >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Your package FTBFS during a rebuilt against libaubio4. Here is the tail >>> from amd64. >> aubio 0.4 is not API-compatible with the previous 0.3 release. aubio >> upstream currently lists both APIs as stable. >> >> Ardour upstream has tightened the dependency to aubio 0.3.2, and it >> certainly needs time to incorporate the API changes. For ardour2 (bug >> #733968), this might never happen unless backported. >> >> There's not even a document on aubio's website how to migrate from 0.3 >> to 0.4.
point, i'm not very good at writing documentation, sorry. >> >> >> Long story short: that's too much for packaging, this is serious >> upstream work. Since Ardour upstream has decided to stick with 0.3.2, I >> suggest we re-introduce libaubio-0.3.x in Debian until the remaining >> users have all been transitioned to aubio4 (read: as soon as the >> r-depends count of aubio3 drops to zero). I'll be happy to write the patches for ardour, ardour3, and denemo. I should be done in a few hours. >> >> >> To be clear: I'm talking about co-existence of both aubio versions in >> Debian, at least temporary. i'll be offline starting tomorrow for 12 days. i hope to have the three patches ready before then. cheers, Paul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
