Hi, Adding Paul Brossier to CC, since he maintains aubio and uploaded the version with the API bump. Paul, please see/comment Adrian's mail below.
>From my point of view (i.e. with my release hat on), I am fine with either resolution the two of you come up with as long as the build failure here is resolved and aubio's transition is finished. ~Niels On 2014-01-09 15:28, Adrian Knoth wrote: > On 01/02/14 19:27, Niels Thykier wrote: > > Hi! > >> Package: ardour3 >> Version: 3.5.143~dfsg-1 >> Severity: serious >> >> Hi, >> >> Your package FTBFS during a rebuilt against libaubio4. Here is the tail >> from amd64. > > aubio 0.4 is not API-compatible with the previous 0.3 release. aubio > upstream currently lists both APIs as stable. > > Ardour upstream has tightened the dependency to aubio 0.3.2, and it > certainly needs time to incorporate the API changes. For ardour2 (bug > #733968), this might never happen unless backported. > > There's not even a document on aubio's website how to migrate from 0.3 > to 0.4. > > > Long story short: that's too much for packaging, this is serious > upstream work. Since Ardour upstream has decided to stick with 0.3.2, I > suggest we re-introduce libaubio-0.3.x in Debian until the remaining > users have all been transitioned to aubio4 (read: as soon as the > r-depends count of aubio3 drops to zero). > > > To be clear: I'm talking about co-existence of both aubio versions in > Debian, at least temporary. > > > > > Cheers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
