Hello, I think there are 2 issues. If you agree we should split this one and provide 2 fixes.
* Sven Eckelmann [2013-12-16 10:11]: > Thanks for the bug report. > > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 16:59:12 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > On Monday 16 December 2013 09:29:25 Julien Cristau wrote: > > > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lungif > > > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > > > Could you check this problem? 1) exactimage links against libungif which package was removed in 2005. giflib provided symlinks until then, but I think we should clean this nowadays. Seeing no reverse dependency on the provided libungif-dev, I (wrongly it seems) assumed that libungif symlinks had their days. I think exactimage should now link with libgif to be more consistent with its build-depends. > > The latest revision of giflib removed its libungif symlinks... > Really? The link is still there but it is broken: > So it seems the libgif-dev_4.1.6-11_amd64.deb is broken. Here is the content: 2) libgif-dev still have the symlinks below that need to be not installed > lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2013-12-07 19:36 ./usr/lib/libungif.la -> > libgif.la > lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2013-12-07 19:36 ./usr/lib/libungif.so -> > libgif.so.4.1.6 > lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2013-12-07 19:36 ./usr/lib/libungif.a -> > libgif.a > lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2013-12-07 19:36 > ./usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgif.so -> libgif.so.4.1.6 I'd like this issue solved before even thinking about a transition to api-incompatible giflib 5. Best regards, Thibaut -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
