-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Le 31/08/2013 02:06, gregor herrmann a écrit :
>> For 2.5.2-3.1, we are fine if you push it to Debian's repo as a NMU. If you
>> think it's preferable however, we can package 2.5.2-4, but this will require
>> me to get sponsored (Vincent Danjean can help me with that) as a Debian
>> Maintainer for the package.
>>
>> For newer versions anyway, I will need to become DM for the package.
>
> It's your decision in the end. My proposal is to let the 2.5.2-3.1 in (I can
> also move it to 0-day for immediate acceptance), then this issue is out of
> the way; and then you have all the time you need to prepare 2.5.3-1 and sort
> out the maintainer and DM questions.
Go ahead with 0-day NMU. I will sort out maintainer and DM questions
with Pierre during the next days/weeks.
Thanks for your patch
Regards,
Vincent
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/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=kuw0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
