Your message dated Wed, 02 Nov 2005 18:17:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315360: fixed in glcpu 1.0.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jun 2005 06:35:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 21 23:35:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dra38-4-82-240-100-147.fbx.proxad.net (localhost.localdomain)
[82.240.100.147]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dkypm-0004HH-00; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 23:35:38 -0700
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id A08511AEC22A; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 08:35:36 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: glcpu: uninstalable in sid
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 08:35:36 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: glcpu
Version: 1.0.1-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
here is the problem:
# apt-get install glcpu
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
glcpu: Depends: libcommoncpp2-1.0-0c102 but it is not installable
E: Broken packages
glcpu needs to be recompiled with a newer libcommoncpp version.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 315360-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Nov 2005 02:21:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 02 18:21:54 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EXUf5-0003Ua-00; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 18:17:07 -0800
From: =?utf-8?q?David_Mart=C3=ADnez_Moreno?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#315360: fixed in glcpu 1.0.1-6
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 18:17:07 -0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
REMOVE_REMOVAL_NEAR autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: glcpu
Source-Version: 1.0.1-6
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glcpu, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
glcpu_1.0.1-6.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/glcpu/glcpu_1.0.1-6.diff.gz
glcpu_1.0.1-6.dsc
to pool/main/g/glcpu/glcpu_1.0.1-6.dsc
glcpu_1.0.1-6_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/glcpu/glcpu_1.0.1-6_i386.deb
statd_1.0.1-6_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/glcpu/statd_1.0.1-6_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
David MartÃnez Moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated glcpu package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 04:04:22 +0100
Source: glcpu
Binary: statd glcpu
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.1-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: David MartÃnez Moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: David MartÃnez Moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
glcpu - 3D-plotter for system activity
statd - data collection daemon for GLcpu
Closes: 315360
Changes:
glcpu (1.0.1-6) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Rebuild with modern build environment (closes: #315360).
* debian/control:
- Replaces libglut3-dev by freeglut3-dev, the library that replaced the
former.
- Bump Standards-Version to 3.6.2.
- Added Depends on netbase for glcpu and statd, as they use update-inetd.
- Removed xlibs-dev from build-dependencies. It is going to be removed.
- Removed versioned dependency on debhelper, as the already minimum
version in oldstable is 4.0.2.
- Updated FSF's address.
* Fixed extended characters (in my surname) in the manpages.
Files:
5a8b658cb76173784fc58afc2391899e 589 x11 optional glcpu_1.0.1-6.dsc
9fdd37678d9b6a630bb0b246e088945b 5576 x11 optional glcpu_1.0.1-6.diff.gz
a71403a5719e0425dc8c9059b59bbd65 26740 x11 optional glcpu_1.0.1-6_i386.deb
2c068162bd2e61b6caa1122672459ff7 11300 net optional statd_1.0.1-6_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDaX5wWs/EhA1iABsRAiEzAJ9z5ftuCJwqsyWmjUFtQKqsmu7ntwCgsatB
n/lt2Xq27zgSjkddmN1CfO8=
=P+q6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
