[recipient list trimmed, although it should probably be even smaller] On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 22:03 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > Nevertheless, why build-depend on a non-existing > package emacsen with emacs23 | emacsen?
It does exist, in exactly the same way that e.g. mail-transport-agent does. > Additionally, it looks like > emacs24 is not the default for unstable, why not? It should be for > testing yes, but unstable? That's up to the emacs maintainer, you might want to ask them rather than us. From memory his plan was to keep 23 as the default in wheezy even if 24 had entered wheezy as it would be too late to transition all of the dependent packages; I assume the default wasn't changed in unstable so that packages didn't get blocked from migrating due to adding dependencies on emacs24. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
