Your message dated Wed, 8 Aug 2012 11:47:00 -0400
with message-id <20120808154700.ga5...@onerussian.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#681581: nipype: FTBFS: IOError: [Errno 2] No such file
or directory: '/tmp/test_engine_o6vea6/pipe/mod1/result_mod1.pklz'
has caused the Debian Bug report #681581,
regarding nipype: FTBFS: IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'/tmp/test_engine_o6vea6/pipe/mod1/result_mod1.pklz'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
681581: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681581
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: nipype
Version: 0.5.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
nipype FTBFS:
| ======================================================================
| ERROR: Failure: IOError ([Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'/tmp/test_engine_o6vea6/pipe/mod1/result_mod1.pklz')
| ----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Traceback (most recent call last):
| File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nose/loader.py", line 231, in
generate
| for test in g():
| File
"/build/nipype-1M7AXB/nipype-0.5.3/debian/python-nipype/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nipype/pipeline/plugins/tests/test_multiproc.py",
line 42, in test_run_multiproc
| execgraph = pipe.run(plugin="MultiProc")
| File
"/build/nipype-1M7AXB/nipype-0.5.3/debian/python-nipype/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nipype/pipeline/engine.py",
line 519, in run
| runner.run(execgraph, updatehash=updatehash, config=self.config)
| File
"/build/nipype-1M7AXB/nipype-0.5.3/debian/python-nipype/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nipype/pipeline/plugins/base.py",
line 179, in run
| slots=slots, graph=graph)
| File
"/build/nipype-1M7AXB/nipype-0.5.3/debian/python-nipype/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nipype/pipeline/plugins/base.py",
line 252, in _send_procs_to_workers
| self.procs[jobid].num_subnodes() > 1:
| File
"/build/nipype-1M7AXB/nipype-0.5.3/debian/python-nipype/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nipype/pipeline/engine.py",
line 1680, in num_subnodes
| self._get_inputs()
| File
"/build/nipype-1M7AXB/nipype-0.5.3/debian/python-nipype/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nipype/pipeline/engine.py",
line 1690, in _get_inputs
| super(MapNode, self)._get_inputs()
| File
"/build/nipype-1M7AXB/nipype-0.5.3/debian/python-nipype/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nipype/pipeline/engine.py",
line 1188, in _get_inputs
| results = loadpkl(results_file)
| File
"/build/nipype-1M7AXB/nipype-0.5.3/debian/python-nipype/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nipype/utils/filemanip.py",
line 395, in loadpkl
| pkl_file = gzip.open(infile, 'rb')
| File "/usr/lib/python2.7/gzip.py", line 34, in open
| return GzipFile(filename, mode, compresslevel)
| File "/usr/lib/python2.7/gzip.py", line 89, in __init__
| fileobj = self.myfileobj = __builtin__.open(filename, mode or 'rb')
| IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'/tmp/test_engine_o6vea6/pipe/mod1/result_mod1.pklz'
| -------------------- >> begin captured logging << --------------------
| workflow: INFO: ['check', 'execution', 'logging']
| workflow: INFO: Running in parallel.
| workflow: INFO: Submitting 1 jobs
| --------------------- >> end captured logging << ---------------------
|
| ----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Ran 1334 tests in 12.259s
|
| FAILED (SKIP=76, errors=1)
| make: *** [install/python-nipype] Error 1
| dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error exit status
2
--
Jakub Wilk
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
The issue was due to a bug in networkx, which nipype upstream (Satra)
localized and Sandro already uploaded networkx 1.7~rc1-3 which should
resolve this FTBFS. Thanks everyone ;)
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Yaroslav Halchenko <y...@debian.org>, 2012-07-15, 14:52:
> >just tried to build again (up to date sid chroot via cowbuilder on
> >amd64 box) -- went just fine. Is it reproducible for you?
> I tried on a different machine: it failed the same way.
> >Any peculiarities of the system where it failed?
> >- architecture (kfreebsd's would lack functional multiprocessing)
> Nothing fancy: i386.
> >- free space under /tmp
> 95G. Should be enough for everybody. :)
> >- network access?
> Nope, no network access.
> >- anything from experimental?
> Nothing.
> >- avail /dev/shm?
> Yes.
--
Yaroslav O. Halchenko
Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik
--- End Message ---
