Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:59:27 +0000
with message-id <20120723175927.ga19...@scru.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#682527: haskell-yesod-routes: FTBFS: Don't use
"ghc-ghci" virtual-package-name on Build-Depends
has caused the Debian Bug report #682527,
regarding haskell-yesod-routes: FTBFS: Don't use "ghc-ghci"
virtual-package-name on Build-Depends
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
682527: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682527
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: haskell-yesod-routes
Version: 1.0.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Don't use "ghc-ghci" virtual-package-name on Build-Depends,
because it has not been allowed yet by Debian-Policy
to use the virtual-package-name of "ghc-ghci".
Regards,
--
Hiroyuki Yamamoto
A75D B285 7050 4BF9 AEDA 91AC 3A10 59C6 5203 04DC
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 02:47:47AM +0900, Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
> Of course, this bug must be FTBFS because the package which cannot exist
> according to the architecture is specified.
Yes, it will fail to build on an architecture that doesn't have ghc-ghci.
However, since it would have not succeeded in the past without ghc-ghci,
this is not an RC issue.
--- End Message ---
