Evgeni Golov writes ("Bug#682100: gscan2pdf Recommends cuneiform which is in non-free"): > the OCR feature is purely optional and thus gscan2pdf should work fine > w/o any ocr backend.
Thanks for responding. > Also, gscan2pdf Rcommends "gocr, tesseract-ocr, cuneiform", which all > are OCR tools and gocr and tesseract being in main. I hadn't spotted this. Surely this should have `|' indicating alternative possibilities rather than `,' indicating that all of the options are required ? How well does gscan2pdf work without ocr software ? Would you say it should be used with ocr software in all but unusual situations ? > From this I think cuneiform can be perfectly moved to Suggests. Perhaps we need a virtual package for ocr software, but I guess it's too late for wheezy. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org