Evgeni Golov writes ("Bug#682100: gscan2pdf Recommends cuneiform which is in 
non-free"):
> the OCR feature is purely optional and thus gscan2pdf should work fine 
> w/o any ocr backend.

Thanks for responding.

> Also, gscan2pdf Rcommends "gocr, tesseract-ocr, cuneiform", which all 
> are OCR tools and gocr and tesseract being in main.

I hadn't spotted this.  Surely this should have `|' indicating
alternative possibilities rather than `,' indicating that all of the
options are required ?

How well does gscan2pdf work without ocr software ?  Would you say it
should be used with ocr software in all but unusual situations ?

> From this I think cuneiform can be perfectly moved to Suggests.

Perhaps we need a virtual package for ocr software, but I guess it's
too late for wheezy.

Ian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to