Urgh, just got a half working X.org env. Still skewed, but slightly workable. Thanks for your patience. Off to work now.
BR -- Danai SAE-HAN On 18-jun.-2012, at 04:35, Julian Gilbey <jul...@d-and-j.net> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 10:22:49PM +0800, Danai SAE-HAN (�n�_耐) wrote: >>> So you could call this one 0.9.9+release-1 and avoid having to use an >>> epoch. 0.9.9.0+git2012415-1 would also work. It seems a shame to >>> introduce an epoch for a case like this where the version numbers are >>> going to increase pretty soon beyond the troublesome case. >> >> Thank you for that tip, Julian. Seems like I forgot to add a "0" in >> the ISO date. >> >> I will use version "0.9.9+release-1" for now, and then use "1.0.0" >> with "pre" or "rc" when biblatex is also upgraded. > > If you want to do that, remember to use the "~" syntax: 1.0.0~pre1-1 > or similar; that way, 1.0.0-1 will be strictly greater than the "pre" > version number! > > Julian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
