On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 10:22:49PM +0800, Danai SAE-HAN (ééè) wrote: > > So you could call this one 0.9.9+release-1 and avoid having to use an > > epoch. Â 0.9.9.0+git2012415-1 would also work. Â It seems a shame to > > introduce an epoch for a case like this where the version numbers are > > going to increase pretty soon beyond the troublesome case. > > Thank you for that tip, Julian. Seems like I forgot to add a "0" in > the ISO date. > > I will use version "0.9.9+release-1" for now, and then use "1.0.0" > with "pre" or "rc" when biblatex is also upgraded.
If you want to do that, remember to use the "~" syntax: 1.0.0~pre1-1 or similar; that way, 1.0.0-1 will be strictly greater than the "pre" version number! Julian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
