On 12-04-06 at 02:34pm, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 15:21 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Thanks for reporting this issue. I agree that it does not make > > sense to build this package for kfreebsd unitl its > > build-dependencies are satisfies, but consider this a minor issue. > > Adjusted severity accordingly. > > The problem isn't that the build-dependencies are unsatisfied. If > that were the case, it wouldn't have been built. The problem is that > the build-dependencies are satisfied, the package is built and the > resulting binaries are uninstallable.
Thanks for the clarification. I blindly assumed that when asterisk was unavailable then asterisk-dev would be unavailable too, but I realize now that obviously the latter can be arch-all, therefore needing special handling by all its dependent packages. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
