severity 613117 grave thanks On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 15:21 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Thanks for reporting this issue. I agree that it does not make sense to > build this package for kfreebsd unitl its build-dependencies are > satisfies, but consider this a minor issue. Adjusted severity > accordingly.
The problem isn't that the build-dependencies are unsatisfied. If that were the case, it wouldn't have been built. The problem is that the build-dependencies are satisfied, the package is built and the resulting binaries are uninstallable. > In case you disagree, you are welcome to elaborate on your reasoning. http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities: "grave makes the package in question unusable or mostly so" A package which is uninstallable on an architecture is unusable on that architecture. That's arguably RC in all cases, it certainly is when the architectures in question are release architectures (whether you agree with that classification). Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
