On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:16:25PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 05:35:15PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:31:18AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:10:18AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 01:54:28AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > > > > On 02/14/2012 01:22 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > > > > Would it be possible for you to provide your make.log? > > > > > > > > > > I've attached it to this mail. > > > > > > > > Here's the root of the problem: > > > > checking for Linux build directory... > > > > /usr/src/linux-headers-3.1.0-1-686-pae > > > > checking for Linux source directory... configure: error: cannot find > > > > source directory (please use --with-linux-source) > > > > > > > > I see that this was already fixed on master with the following commit: > > > > > > > > Subject: [PATCH] debian: Look in /lib/modules instead of /usr/src for > > > > DKMS kernel sources. > > > > > > > > DKMS packages usually look in /lib/modules for kernel sources, since > > > > that > > > > is the "standard" location, but our packages was looking directly in > > > > /usr/src. This fixes the problem. > > > > > > > > Reported-by: Alban Browaeys <pra...@yahoo.com> > > > > Tested-by: Alban Browaeys <pra...@yahoo.com> > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> > > > > --- > > > > Somehow this bug fix did not make it to branches for 1.3 or 1.4. I've > > > > now cherry-picked it to both branches, so the next Debian upload > > > > should incorporate the fix. > > > > > > > > I see that we should really be using "&&' instead of ";" in the make > > > > rule. I sent out a patch. > > > > > > Thanks Ben, I plan to make make a fresh upload for this. > > > > Thanks. > > > > It might be wise to hold off for: > > http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2012-February/014947.html > > or to plan to make another new upload after it hits. > > I am planing to include that patch in my upload.
That makes sense. > I was not planing to wait for it to hit the git repo > but I can if you prefer. I don't think that is necessary. I tested it before I posted it, and you said that you tested it too, and that is good enough for me. > I have confirmed that with the patch at the link above and other > patches it depends on applied the resulting package installs on my system - > though it should be said that the package that is currently present in > the archive is also installable on my system. As on mine. Thanks, Ben. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
