Hi, From: <ond...@sury.org> Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 11:04:05 +0100
> Hi, > > in Debian it is not responsibility of individual packages, but generaly of a > packaging system. > > Unfortunatelly what you are asking is impossible to achieve. I believe it's > not a bug, but a failed ruby concept of havimg versioned dependencies but no > SONAMEs. Therefore there can be only one rack package installed at the time. Hmm. * The original rails insists it requires rack 1.0.1. * Actually a loss of data has occurred with the rack 1.1.0. So, the "only one rack package" should be the one whose version is 1.0.1, isn't it? And to achieve it, I wonder is there another way. > > I believe it's the source code in the package which needs fixing and not the > versioned depends. I didn't figure out which source code you are referring to. I just want to overcome the loss of data, and am willing to be convinced :-) Thank you. --- Kubo Hiroshi <h-k...@geisya.or.jp> Blog: http://cryptotaenian.blogspot.com/ > > Ondřej Surý > > On 15. 1. 2012, at 5:06, Kubo Hiroshi <h-k...@geisya.or.jp> wrote: > >> Jérémy, thank you for your quick response. >> >> From: <je...@edagames.com> >> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 19:38:11 +0100 >> >>> On 14/01/2012 17:10, Kubo Hiroshi wrote: >>>> Package: libactivesupport-ruby1.8 >>>> Source: rails >>>> Version: 2.3.5-1.2+squeeze1 >>>> Tags: redmine librack-ruby libactivesupport-ruby >>>> Severity: grave >>>> >>>> In squeeze, when redmine package is installed, rails 2.3.5-11.2+squeeze1 >>>> and librack-ruby 1.1.0-4 are installed at the same time for its dependency. >>>> >>>> But in the upstream document of the Redmine 1.0.1, >>>> rack 1.0.1 is officially supported, not 1.1.0. >>> >>> Why do you think it's a bug in rails package ? >>> Reading your report it looks more like a bug in redmine. >>> >> >> As far as I read the source code, keeping correct combination >> of the versions is rails' responsibility, not redmine's. >> >> The patch 'debian-changes-2.3.5-1' included in the rails >> source package overwrites the original gem's version check as follows: >> >> -gem 'rack', '~> 1.0.1' >> -require 'rack' >> +begin >> + require 'rack' >> +rescue LoadError >> + gem 'rack', '~> 1.0.1' >> + require 'rack' >> +end >> >> >> --- >> Kubo Hiroshi <h-k...@geisya.or.jp> >> Blog: http://cryptotaenian.blogspot.com/ >> >> >> >>> >>> For the record, i reproduced taht bug with (these intermediate versions) : >>> redmine 1.1.3-1 >>> rails 2.3.11-0.1 >>> librack-ruby 1.1.0-4 >>> >>> But not in debian/testing. >>> >>> Jérémy. >>> >> >> >> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
