On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:08:13AM -0600, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > > So I haven't actually *checked*, but from what I understood of this > > thread the ABI changes were compatible, which means there is and was no > > reason to bump the SONAME, only the version in the shlibs packaging > > metadata, for the added symbols in 2.4.2. This is not an upstream > > problem, it's a bug in the package, there is nothing for upstream to do > > here AFAIK. > > That clears is up. I'll do the needful. Thanks.
So, currently, the shlibs file reads: libarmadillo 2 libarmadillo2 Now, should I use a new package name, like libarmadillo2a, or so, which conflicts with libarmadillo2? I am unclear… Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
