On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:46:46 +0100, Johannes Ring wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Andreas Kloeckner <inf...@tiker.net> wrote:
> > Did, and it helped. Thanks very much!
>
> Good!
>
> > This being as it is, could you upload a new package with tightened
> > dependencies?
>
> The dependency on libarmadillo2 is added automatically by
> ${shlibs:Depends}. I guess I could add a version requirement for
> libarmadillo-dev in Build-Depends, but DOLFIN does not depend on a
> specific version of Armadillo, so I don't see why I should. You had
> this problem because you were using an old libarmadillo2 (version
> 1:2.2.5+dfsg-1) from testing while you using DOLFIN (version 1.0.0-1)
> from unstable, which was built against a newer libarmadillo2 package
> from unstable. I guess this is a problem you will see from time to
> time when mixing packages from testing and unstable.
>
No, it absolutely isn't. If libarmadillo2 exports new symbols then it
has to bump the version in its shlibs declaration. If it didn't do
that, this is a serious bug in that package.
Cheers,
Julien
--
Julien Cristau <julien.cris...@logilab.fr>
Logilab http://www.logilab.fr/
Informatique scientifique & gestion de connaissances
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
