On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 05:09:08PM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote: >On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 09:26:37PM +0000, Robin Cornelius wrote: >>Hi Steve >> >>> No sign of any progress on this bug in quite a while, and now it's >>> causing build failures in Debian too with multi-arch. Are you planning >>> to work on this in the near future? >> >>Ah sorry, I actually did this back in April and had everything staged >>in my git at >>https://robincornel...@github.com/robincornelius/xmlrpc-epi-debian.git >>but then never did that last step to finish off by getting it uploaded >>by a DD. > >OK... > >>Worse than that the upstream change log hints I fixed this upstream in >>Feb last year ;-/ > >:-( > >>I expect that git repro is lagging behind latest packaging policy now >>so will need another update, but hopefully a pretty trivial one. If >>you could take a peek and see if everything else is now fine with it >>i'll also check it over tomorrow when i'm in the office and see if we >>can get this uploaded. > >Building from that, I can see a few lintian warnings and an error: > >W: xmlrpc-epi source: debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-arch >W: xmlrpc-epi source: debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-indep >W: xmlrpc-epi source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.1 (current is 3.9.2) >W: libxmlrpc-epi0: description-synopsis-starts-with-article >W: libxmlrpc-epi0-dbg: wrong-section-according-to-package-name >libxmlrpc-epi0-dbg => debug >E: libxmlrpc-epi-dev: non-empty-dependency_libs-in-la-file >usr/lib/libxmlrpc-epi.la > >which should be fixed. Also, moving things to multi-arch paths if >possible would be a really nice thing to do now.
Ping? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com Is there anybody out there? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
