On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 09:26:37PM +0000, Robin Cornelius wrote: >Hi Steve > >> No sign of any progress on this bug in quite a while, and now it's >> causing build failures in Debian too with multi-arch. Are you planning >> to work on this in the near future? > >Ah sorry, I actually did this back in April and had everything staged >in my git at >https://robincornel...@github.com/robincornelius/xmlrpc-epi-debian.git >but then never did that last step to finish off by getting it uploaded >by a DD.
OK... >Worse than that the upstream change log hints I fixed this upstream in >Feb last year ;-/ :-( >I expect that git repro is lagging behind latest packaging policy now >so will need another update, but hopefully a pretty trivial one. If >you could take a peek and see if everything else is now fine with it >i'll also check it over tomorrow when i'm in the office and see if we >can get this uploaded. Building from that, I can see a few lintian warnings and an error: W: xmlrpc-epi source: debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-arch W: xmlrpc-epi source: debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-indep W: xmlrpc-epi source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.1 (current is 3.9.2) W: libxmlrpc-epi0: description-synopsis-starts-with-article W: libxmlrpc-epi0-dbg: wrong-section-according-to-package-name libxmlrpc-epi0-dbg => debug E: libxmlrpc-epi-dev: non-empty-dependency_libs-in-la-file usr/lib/libxmlrpc-epi.la which should be fixed. Also, moving things to multi-arch paths if possible would be a really nice thing to do now. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com "...In the UNIX world, people tend to interpret `non-technical user' as meaning someone who's only ever written one device driver." -- Daniel Pead -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
