* Carsten Hey [2011-12-04 16:11 +0100]: > * Jakub Wilk [2011-12-04 15:00 +0100]: > > * Carsten Hey <cars...@debian.org>, 2011-12-04, 14:45: > > >A NMU was prepared for an other RC bug in ethos but canceled > > >afterwards, possibly because of this (at that moment unfiled) > > >FTBFS bug. > > > > If you mean my NMU to fix #640596 and #641871, then no. It was > > cancelled because there was a maintainer upload with higher version. > > The package built fine at that point. > > Yes, I did mean your NMU to fix #640596 and #641871. The latter was > btw. not fixed by this _binary NMU_. > > | python-ethos | 0.2.2-2+b1 | sid | amd64, armel, i386, ia64, ...
Disregard this, it was a maintainer upload, the binary NMU was done later. #641871 is still not fixed, though. Carsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org