* Carsten Hey [2011-12-04 16:11 +0100]:
> * Jakub Wilk [2011-12-04 15:00 +0100]:
> > * Carsten Hey <cars...@debian.org>, 2011-12-04, 14:45:
> > >A NMU was prepared for an other RC bug in ethos but canceled
> > >afterwards, possibly because of this (at that moment unfiled)
> > >FTBFS bug.
> >
> > If you mean my NMU to fix #640596 and #641871, then no. It was
> > cancelled because there was a maintainer upload with higher version.
> > The package built fine at that point.
>
> Yes, I did mean your NMU to fix #640596 and #641871.  The latter was
> btw. not fixed by this _binary NMU_.
>
> | python-ethos | 0.2.2-2+b1   | sid     | amd64, armel, i386, ia64, ...

Disregard this, it was a maintainer upload, the binary NMU was done
later.  #641871 is still not fixed, though.


Carsten



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to