* Jakub Wilk [2011-12-04 15:00 +0100]: > * Carsten Hey <cars...@debian.org>, 2011-12-04, 14:45: > >A NMU was prepared for an other RC bug in ethos but canceled > >afterwards, possibly because of this (at that moment unfiled) > >FTBFS bug. > > If you mean my NMU to fix #640596 and #641871, then no. It was > cancelled because there was a maintainer upload with higher version. > The package built fine at that point.
Yes, I did mean your NMU to fix #640596 and #641871. The latter was btw. not fixed by this _binary NMU_. | python-ethos | 0.2.2-2+b1 | sid | amd64, armel, i386, ia64, ... There is an RFA filed about the package: http://bugs.debian.org/578696 A mail by the maintainer (who might not be aware of the RFA) to this bug to state if he is really seeking for a co-maintainer or someone to adopt the package could be appropriate. Regards Carsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
