Hello

On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 01:42:36PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote:
> Hi Ola,
> 
> ?b 2005/10/3 ?W?? 3:39 ???AOla Lundqvist ?g???G
> 
> >Now I have run the entire test suite...
> >
> >zircone:/srv/vservers/labradorit/root# ./testfs.sh -l -t -D /dev/ 
> >loop4 -M /mnt/t
> >Linux-VServer FS Test [V0.09] Copyright (C) 2005 H.Poetzl
> >Linux 2.4.27-mppe+ctx+vlan-686-smp i686/0.30.204
> >VCI:  <none>   (unknown)
> 
> Sorry, it's my fault again, I didn't mention all the steps.
> You should make a loopback file and run losetup /dev/loop4  
> loopbackfile before run the testfs.sh script.
> The VCI shouldn't be <none> if you have setup /dev/loop4 correctly, I  
> did same thing and got same errors when I forgot to setup the /dev/ 
> loop4 after a reboot.
> 
> Here is what I did for create a loopback file and the run losetup:
> # dd bs=1024k count=1024 if=/dev/zero of=1gb.testfile
> # losetup /dev/loop4 1gb.testfs
> Note: I have other loopback files running on /dev/loop{0,1,2,3}  
> already, so I use /dev/loop4 in my case.

Ok. I created a lvm device and used that for testing instead.

> Very sorry for made your confused. Could you please test it again?
Sure.

zircone:/srv/vservers/labradorit/root# ./testfs.sh -l -t -D /dev/vg00/testdev 
-M  /mnt/t
Linux-VServer FS Test [V0.09] Copyright (C) 2005 H.Poetzl
Linux 2.4.27-mppe+ctx+vlan-686-smp i686/0.30.204
VCI:  <none>   (unknown)
---
testing ext2 filesystem ...
[000]. xattr related tests ...
[101]. [102]. [103]* [104]* [106]* [108]. [109]*
[112]. [113]. [114]* [115]. [116]. [117]. [118]. [119].
[121]* [122]* [123]. [124]* [199].
---
testing ext3 filesystem ...
[000]. xattr related tests ...
[101]. [102]. [103]* [104]* [106]* [108]. [109]*
[112]. [113]. [114]* [115]. [116]. [117]. [118]. [119].
[121]* [122]* [123]. [124]* [199].
---
testing xfs filesystem ...
[000]* (xfs format failed)
---
testing reiser filesystem ...
[000]* (reiser format failed)
---
testing jfs filesystem ...
[000]* (jfs format failed)

> I think the testfs.sh script will give you information of VCI and do  
> the real checks on each task after you setup /dev/loop4 correctly.
> If the testfs.sh give you fails on 109 and 121, that can confirm this  
> is bug.

It is a bug then.

> For other fails, you may ask Bertl, cause upstream author knows much  
> more than me, also much better than I forward your questions to him. :)
> 
> I suggest to put or mention these test tasks in util-vserver package  
> for our users to make sure the vserver patch+tools work properly.
> Should I create another report as wistlist or only mentioned here is  
> enough?

Made that as a separate bug report.

Regards,

// Ola

> Regards,
> 
> -Andrew
> 

-- 
 --------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/  [EMAIL PROTECTED]                     Annebergsslingan 37      \
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED]                 654 65 KARLSTAD          |
|  +46 (0)54-10 14 30                  +46 (0)70-332 1551       |
|  http://www.opal.dhs.org             UIN/icq: 4912500         |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36  4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
 ---------------------------------------------------------------


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to