-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
These bug reports are very confusing, I am performing my own tests to
help clarify.
Andrew Lee wrote:
> The VCI shouldn't be <none> if you have setup /dev/loop4 correctly, I
> did same thing and got same errors when I forgot to setup the /dev/
> loop4 after a reboot.
No, "VCI: <none> (unknown)" is fine in 2.4 because 2.4 has no VCI info.
> Here is what I did for create a loopback file and the run losetup:
> # dd bs=1024k count=1024 if=/dev/zero of=1gb.testfile
> # losetup /dev/loop4 1gb.testfs
> Note: I have other loopback files running on /dev/loop{0,1,2,3}
> already, so I use /dev/loop4 in my case.
The following is the results of my tests:
For all tests the following packages need to be installed:
xfsprogs jfsutils reiserfsprogs reiser4progs util-vserver
(0.30.204-5sarge2 unless otherwise noted)
Procedure is to do:
1. # dd bs=1024k count=1024 if=/dev/zero of=/home/1gb.testfile
2. # losetup /dev/loop4 /home/1gb.testfile
3. # mkdir /mnt2
On 2.6 kernels the following switches were used to test:
4. # ./testfs.sh-0.09 -vv -D /dev/loop4 -M /mnt2
Test 1:
Sarge kernel 2.6.8 (2.6.8-16) with debian package kernel-patch-vserver
(debian package version: 1.9.5.3, kernel patch:
patch-2.6.8-15-vs1.9.5.x-4.diff.gz) applied on an i386 machine.
Results:
All the tests succeed on ext2/ext3/reiserfs, the following fail:
xfs: 103, 106, 113, 115, 117
jfs: 104, 114, 121, 122, 123, 124
Test 2:
Sarge kernel 2.6.8 (2.6.8-16) with debian kernel-patch-vserver (debian
package version: 1.9.5.4 (not in sarge), kernel patch
patch-2.6.8-15-vs1.9.5.x-5.diff.gz) applied on an i386 machine.
Results:
Exactly the same as the results from Test 1
Test 3:
Sarge kernel 2.4.27 (2.4.27-10) with the debian kernel-patch-vserver
(debian package version: 1.9.5.3, kernel patch
patch-2.4.27-9-vs1.2.10-2.diff.gz) applied on an i386 machine.
Results:
ext2/ext3 failures: 103, 104, 106, 109, 114, 121, 122, 124
xfs failures: 103, 104, 106, 109, 114, 115, 117, 121, 122, 124
reiserfs failures: 103, 104, 106, 109, 114, 118, 119, 121, 122, 124
jfs failures: 103, 104, 106, 109, 112, 113, 114, 116, 118, 119, 121,
122, 123, 124
Note: Bertl says this is a failure with the util-vserver tools, so I
perform the test again with util-vserver .208 from unstable:
Test 4:
Sarge kernel 2.4.27 (2.4.27-10) with the debian kernel-patch-vserver
(debian package version: 1.9.5.3, kernel patch
patch-2.4.27-9-vs1.2.10-2.diff.gz) applied on an i386 machine. Using
util-vserver tools from unstable (0.30.208-2)
ext2/ext3 failures: 104, 106, 114, 122, 124
xfs failures: 103, 104, 106, 114, 115, 117, 121, 122, 124
reiserfs failures: 104, 106, 114, 118, 119, 122, 124
jfs failures: 102, 103, 104, 106, 109, 112, 113, 114, 116, 118, 119,
121, 122, 123, 124
Micah
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDQwmG9n4qXRzy1ioRAsSXAJ9Y8qjKsK/xYDXBcYWWgrh9TC761QCfdo/0
WhPUbXCtnk/DR+RZiCL7vNs=
=39eq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
