On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 08:43:49PM -0400, Simon L'nu wrote: > > slapd runs fine here, including on i386, when I test it. It also passed its > > test suite when built on the buildds. This may be a gnutls problem, but > > it's not as simple as "running slapd with no options whatever". In > > particular, your list of mapped modules includes a large number of slapd > > plugins which are not loaded by default. So to debug this, we're going to > > need to see a slapd config that can be used to reproduce it.
> i'm happy it runs for you :). Well, that means I can't help you fix the problem because I can't reproduce it. Can you please send us a slapd configuration that we could use to reproduce the problem? > > If anything, I suspect the recent patch to change ltdl behavior to be > > responsible. This was meant to fix bug #327585, but it affects the loading > > of all modules, not just back_perl. Could you try rebuilding slapd with > > debian/patches/switch-to-lt_dlopenadvise-to-get-RTLD_GLOBAL-set.diff > > commented out of debian/patches/series, to see if that fixes the problem for > > you? > i'll do it soon. Ok, thanks. We really don't want to back that patch out though if we can avoid it, so a reproducible test case is still needed. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
