tags 645810 moreinfo unreproducible thanks On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 03:23:08PM -0400, Simon L'nu wrote: > Package: slapd > Version: 2.4.25-4 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable
> this is me running slapd with no options whatever, trying to see if it'll > run at all. > i bet if i build it with openssl it'll build. i know the situation with > the openssl licencing, and gnutls issues, so no need to explain it to me. > i just wish gnutls worked better ;). > i've run it several times, i've pasted only the start (backtrace) for the > second one (below this first one), just to confirm it is gnutls. slapd runs fine here, including on i386, when I test it. It also passed its test suite when built on the buildds. This may be a gnutls problem, but it's not as simple as "running slapd with no options whatever". In particular, your list of mapped modules includes a large number of slapd plugins which are not loaded by default. So to debug this, we're going to need to see a slapd config that can be used to reproduce it. If anything, I suspect the recent patch to change ltdl behavior to be responsible. This was meant to fix bug #327585, but it affects the loading of all modules, not just back_perl. Could you try rebuilding slapd with debian/patches/switch-to-lt_dlopenadvise-to-get-RTLD_GLOBAL-set.diff commented out of debian/patches/series, to see if that fixes the problem for you? BTW, do you really have five different database backends configured on this server...? <snip> > b6478000-b649a000 r-xp 00000000 fe:03 2930061 > /usr/lib/ldap/back_ldap-2.4.so.2.7.0 > b649a000-b649b000 r--p 00021000 fe:03 2930061 > /usr/lib/ldap/back_ldap-2.4.so.2.7.0 > b649b000-b649c000 rw-p 00022000 fe:03 2930061 > /usr/lib/ldap/back_ldap-2.4.so.2.7.0 > b649c000-b649d000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 > b649d000-b64b6000 r-xp 00000000 fe:03 2930113 > /usr/lib/ldap/back_monitor-2.4.so.2.7.0 > b64b6000-b64b7000 r--p 00018000 fe:03 2930113 > /usr/lib/ldap/back_monitor-2.4.so.2.7.0 > b64b7000-b64b8000 rw-p 00019000 fe:03 2930113 > /usr/lib/ldap/back_monitor-2.4.so.2.7.0 > b64b8000-b64bc000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 > b64bc000-b64bf000 r-xp 00000000 fe:03 2894477 > /usr/lib/ldap/back_dnssrv-2.4.so.2.7.0 > b64bf000-b64c0000 r--p 00002000 fe:03 2894477 > /usr/lib/ldap/back_dnssrv-2.4.so.2.7.0 > b64c0000-b64c1000 rw-p 00003000 fe:03 2894477 > /usr/lib/ldap/back_dnssrv-2.4.so.2.7.0 > b64c1000-b64f0000 r-xp 00000000 fe:03 2902287 > /usr/lib/ldap/back_hdb-2.4.so.2.7.0 > b64f0000-b64f1000 r--p 0002e000 fe:03 2902287 > /usr/lib/ldap/back_hdb-2.4.so.2.7.0 > b64f1000-b64f2000 rw-p 0002f000 fe:03 2902287 > /usr/lib/ldap/back_hdb-2.4.so.2.7.0 > b64f2000-b64fe000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 > b64fe000-b652b000 r-xp 00000000 fe:03 2930103 > /usr/lib/ldap/back_bdb-2.4.so.2.7.0 > b652b000-b652c000 r--p 0002d000 fe:03 2930103 > /usr/lib/ldap/back_bdb-2.4.so.2.7.0 > b652c000-b652d000 rw-p 0002e000 fe:03 2930103 > /usr/lib/ldap/back_bdb-2.4.so.2.7.0 > b652d000-b6539000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 <snip> -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
