On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 04:33:21PM +0200, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote:
> >>>>> "RE" == Rene Engelhard <r...@debian.org> writes:
>
> RE> No. Read my mail. The fix is to remove your broken copy of
^^^^^^
> RE> libpng.so.12 in /usr/local/lib.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> O.K.
Not OK.
> Updating the library was the first thing I tried to do, "it's
> outdated" I thought.
>
> I then run an apt-get update, and apt-get ugrade and the problem is
> still there.
>
> I then run apt-get install --reinstall libpng12-0 and the problem is
> still there.
I haven't said you should upgrade or reinstall libpng12-0. I said that
libpng12-0 was *CORRECT*. libpng12-0 doesn't install its lib into
/usr/local/lib but /usr/lib.
The /usr/local/lib is simply a copy you or some install script put there.
Remove it:
rm -f /usr/local/lib/libpng.so.12
(and maybe even for some more libs, I honestly don't care)
> The problemi is still there.
Because you didn't remove tbe broken library.
> Does it means that the bug is in the packaging of libpng12-0 for the
> amd64 architecture ?
No, it's a problem with you having a broken libpng.so.2 in /usr/local/lib,
as I say for the third - and last - time now. libpng12-0 is
- as said - correct.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
