Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 03:03:26PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: >> During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we >> decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very >> long time could cover up some QA problems. >> >> I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I propose >> to remove it. >> There are only a few users, it's quite out of date wrt Debian's policy >> and seems to be upstream-dead. > Thanks for raising this. In response: I've updated it wrt policy. It > is not so much upstream-dead as upstream-frozen: it is a working piece > of software, like CWEB itself, which happily does the task it was > designed for and is not obviously in need of further enhancement. I'm > unsure whether it's worth keeping in Debian, but it's very low > maintenance (only keeping abreast of Debian policy, which I'd > overlooked) and has never seen any bugs besides this one. > > So for these few users, is it necessary to delete it?
No, as long as the package is maintained, I don't see a problem. Please close this bug yourself, thanks. Marc -- BOFH #420: Feature was not beta tested
pgpIcJEQhRaFh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
