On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 11:53:06PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 03:03:26PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > >> During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we > >> decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very > >> long time could cover up some QA problems. > >> > >> I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I propose > >> to remove it. > >> There are only a few users, it's quite out of date wrt Debian's policy > >> and seems to be upstream-dead. > > Thanks for raising this. In response: I've updated it wrt policy. It > > is not so much upstream-dead as upstream-frozen: it is a working piece > > of software, like CWEB itself, which happily does the task it was > > designed for and is not obviously in need of further enhancement. I'm > > unsure whether it's worth keeping in Debian, but it's very low > > maintenance (only keeping abreast of Debian policy, which I'd > > overlooked) and has never seen any bugs besides this one. > > > > So for these few users, is it necessary to delete it? > > No, as long as the package is maintained, I don't see a problem. Please > close this bug yourself, thanks.
Great, thanks. Have done. Julian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
