On 19/07/11 at 09:54 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 19 July 2011 at 16:34, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > | On 19/07/11 at 09:16 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | > > | > On 19 July 2011 at 15:52, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > | > | On 19/07/11 at 05:23 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | > | > > | > | > Hi Lucas, > | > | > > | > | > Appreciate your rebuild efforts. > | > | > > | > | > Question, though: > | > | > > | > | > On 19 July 2011 at 08:33, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > | > | > | Source: cairodevice > | > | > | Version: 2.15-1 > | > | > | Severity: serious > | > | > | Tags: wheezy sid > | > | > | User: debian...@lists.debian.org > | > | > | Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110718 qa-ftbfs > | > | > | Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > | > | > | > | > | > | Hi, > | > | > | > | > | > | During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to > build on > | > | > | amd64. > | > | > | > | > | > | Relevant part: > | > | > | > make[1]: Entering directory > `/build/cairodevice-pw6pXr/cairodevice-2.15/src' > | > | > | > make[1]: Leaving directory > `/build/cairodevice-pw6pXr/cairodevice-2.15/src' > | > | > | > installing to > /build/cairodevice-pw6pXr/cairodevice-2.15/debian/r-cran-cairodevice/usr/lib/R/site-library/cairoDevice/libs > | > | > | > ** R > | > | > | > ** demo > | > | > | > ** preparing package for lazy loading > | > | > | > ** help > | > | > | > *** installing help indices > | > | > | > ** building package indices ... > | > | > | > ** testing if installed package can be loaded > | > | > | > Error : .onLoad failed in loadNamespace() for 'cairoDevice', > details: > | > | > | > call: fun(...) > | > | > | > error: GDK display not found - please make sure X11 is running > | > | > > | > | > This has worked for many years by a Build-Depends: on xvfb, and then > using > | > | > xvfb-run. > | > | > > | > | > Could this be something local to your setup? > | > | > | > | It's possible. > | > | > | > | > | > Error: loading failed > | > | > | > Execution halted > | > | > | > ERROR: loading failed > | > | > | > * removing > '/build/cairodevice-pw6pXr/cairodevice-2.15/debian/r-cran-cairodevice/usr/lib/R/site-library/cairoDevice' > | > | > | > kill: 186: No such process > | > | > > | > | > That 'kill: 186' is very bizarre, and identical to three other bug > reports > | > | > you just sent me. Is there a chance something went wrong at your end? > | > | > | > | It's possible, again. I don't have much time to investigate. I can only > | > | say that many R packages were failing, and I didn't file bugs for all of > | > | them. Also, I run builds twice to make sure that a temporary glitch > | > | doesn't cause false positives, but it could still be the case. > | > > | > Ok, here is a little colour from me: > | > > | > -- there are now well over 100 r-cran-*, a few dozen are 'mine' > | > > | > -- I have quite some experience which "batch building" as we ran a > service > | > called cran2deb once which took all of CRAN and (with some tools) > created > | > r-cran-* for each of these; at the same around 2100 or so packages > (and > | > CRAN now has more than 3100) > | > > | > -- pbuilder did NOT reliably work in parallel there, we always serialized > | > | I use sbuild, not pbuilder, and usually it works fine in parallel (for > | all packages). I don't think that the problem is there, and your patch > | described below should solve the remaining problem. > | > | > -- I got a recent patch to the r-cran.mk called from debian/rules which > lets > | > xvfb-run 'rotate' over a set of ports; that should help with the > previous > | > builds > | > | Indeed > > That patch was applied a few weeks ago: > > r-base (2.13.1-1) unstable; urgency=low > > * New upstream release > > * R/m4, configure: Override bzip2 test for 1.0.6 to let our patched > 1.0.5 version pass as lintian does not like the embedded library > > -- Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> Fri, 08 Jul 2011 06:17:17 -0500 > > r-base (2.13.0-4) unstable; urgency=low > > * debian/r-cran.mk: Make call to xvfb-run more robust by adding '-a' > option to allow automatic switching to free virtual server; with thanks > to Salvatore Bonaccorso for the suggestions (Closes: > #630869) > > -- Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:59:55 -0500 > > > So I assume you already used it?
According to the build log: Get:167 http://localhost/debian/ sid/main r-base-core amd64 2.13.1-1 [15.2 MB] Get:168 http://localhost/debian/ sid/main r-base-dev all 2.13.1-1 [3490 B] - Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
