On 19 July 2011 at 15:52, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: | On 19/07/11 at 05:23 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > Hi Lucas, | > | > Appreciate your rebuild efforts. | > | > Question, though: | > | > On 19 July 2011 at 08:33, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: | > | Source: cairodevice | > | Version: 2.15-1 | > | Severity: serious | > | Tags: wheezy sid | > | User: debian...@lists.debian.org | > | Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110718 qa-ftbfs | > | Justification: FTBFS on amd64 | > | | > | Hi, | > | | > | During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on | > | amd64. | > | | > | Relevant part: | > | > make[1]: Entering directory `/build/cairodevice-pw6pXr/cairodevice-2.15/src' | > | > make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/cairodevice-pw6pXr/cairodevice-2.15/src' | > | > installing to /build/cairodevice-pw6pXr/cairodevice-2.15/debian/r-cran-cairodevice/usr/lib/R/site-library/cairoDevice/libs | > | > ** R | > | > ** demo | > | > ** preparing package for lazy loading | > | > ** help | > | > *** installing help indices | > | > ** building package indices ... | > | > ** testing if installed package can be loaded | > | > Error : .onLoad failed in loadNamespace() for 'cairoDevice', details: | > | > call: fun(...) | > | > error: GDK display not found - please make sure X11 is running | > | > This has worked for many years by a Build-Depends: on xvfb, and then using | > xvfb-run. | > | > Could this be something local to your setup? | | It's possible. | | > | > Error: loading failed | > | > Execution halted | > | > ERROR: loading failed | > | > * removing '/build/cairodevice-pw6pXr/cairodevice-2.15/debian/r-cran-cairodevice/usr/lib/R/site-library/cairoDevice' | > | > kill: 186: No such process | > | > That 'kill: 186' is very bizarre, and identical to three other bug reports | > you just sent me. Is there a chance something went wrong at your end? | | It's possible, again. I don't have much time to investigate. I can only | say that many R packages were failing, and I didn't file bugs for all of | them. Also, I run builds twice to make sure that a temporary glitch | doesn't cause false positives, but it could still be the case.
Ok, here is a little colour from me: -- there are now well over 100 r-cran-*, a few dozen are 'mine' -- I have quite some experience which "batch building" as we ran a service called cran2deb once which took all of CRAN and (with some tools) created r-cran-* for each of these; at the same around 2100 or so packages (and CRAN now has more than 3100) -- pbuilder did NOT reliably work in parallel there, we always serialized -- I got a recent patch to the r-cran.mk called from debian/rules which lets xvfb-run 'rotate' over a set of ports; that should help with the previous builds -- I cannot offer other help besides saying ... "in my chroot it all works" What can we do to improve things? Dirk | | L. -- Gauss once played himself in a zero-sum game and won $50. -- #11 at http://www.gaussfacts.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org