I am aware that there may be reasons to deprecate sslv2. But could we please record this discussion in Bugzilla?
-- Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation Total Lifecycle Support for Your Networked Applications http://www.riverace.com > -----Original Message----- > From: devo-group-boun...@list.isis.vanderbilt.edu > [mailto:devo-group-boun...@list.isis.vanderbilt.edu] On > Behalf Of William R. Otte > Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 2:21 PM > To: Thomas Girard > Cc: 622...@bugs.debian.org; devo-group > Subject: Re: [devo-group] ace: FTBFS: SSL_Context.cpp:244:16: > error:'::SSLv2_client_method' has not been declared > > > Hi - > > On May 11, 2011, at 2:16 PM, Thomas Girard wrote: > > Le 11/05/2011 18:20, Steve Huston a écrit : > >> Thomas, is this issue in Bugzilla? If not, please enter it there. > > > > It is: http://bugzilla.dre.vanderbilt.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=3958 > > > >> I don't have an immediate reaction to the choices, but > off-the cuff I > >> tend to favor b under configuration control, defaulting to > historic > >> behavior allowing sslv2. > > > > SSLv2 was removed from Debian openssl version. No way to > get it back. > > > > I've also heard that it has been removed from future OS X > versions. Not that OS X is currently an officially supported > (besides myself) configuration. It might be worthwhile > making plans for its deprecation from other platforms as well. > > thanks, > /-Will > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
