On Thu, 05 May 2011 21:10:36 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > > So, since the above have been fixed, am I right in thinking that > > > it would be appropriate to request removal of this package in > > > unstable? > > I think we can also leave it in unstable with the bug open (like a > > few other packages that were obsoleted by perl 5.10.1 in squeeze), > > and remove it only from testing. > Presumably your reason for leaving it in unstable is that it's slightly > less churn than removing it only to add it again if a new version is > released?
Exactly, sorry for leaving out the reasoning. > If so, then I'm fine with that. In which case I guess we just leave > this RC bug open, making a clear statement that it's a deliberate > hint that the package should be removed from testing. Ack. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - PGP/GPG key ID: 0x8649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Bruce Springsteen: Brilliant Disguise
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
