On Wed, 04 May 2011 23:42:14 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > Still, the only collateral damage I can see with a few quick grep-dctrl > > runs is > > libcipux-perl (#624304) > Seems to be fixed in a recent upload although the bug hasn't been > closed.
Great! > So, since the above have been fixed, am I right in thinking that > it would be appropriate to request removal of this package in > unstable? I think we can also leave it in unstable with the bug open (like a few other packages that were obsoleted by perl 5.10.1 in squeeze), and remove it only from testing. Or does this cause any troubles? I guess the package managers should be able to deal with the Breaks in an appropriate way. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - PGP/GPG key ID: 0x8649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Pogues: The Old Main Drag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
