Hi! On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 22:17:38 +1000, Kel Modderman wrote: > On Friday 18 March 2011 07:46:23 Michael Biebl wrote: > > Package: wpasupplicant > > Version: 0.7.3-1 > > Severity: serious
> > wpasupplicant ftbfs on kfree-bsd: > > > > /usr/bin/ld: ../src/utils/pcsc_funcs.o: undefined reference to symbol > > 'dlsym@@GLIBC_2.3' > > /usr/bin/ld: note: 'dlsym@@GLIBC_2.3' is defined in DSO //lib/libdl.so.2 > > so try adding it to the linker command line > > //lib/libdl.so.2: could not read symbols: Invalid operation > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > make[2]: *** [wpa_supplicant] Error 1 > > > > Complete build log is at > > https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=wpasupplicant&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=0.7.3-1&stamp=1299705072&file=log&as=raw > > > > Looks like the build failure is due to 08_pcsc_dynamic.patch > We could drop the patch or we could update the patch to add '-ldl' to LIBS in > build system. I'm undecided, and atm extremely burnt out with real life work, > so am looking for some advice. > > 08_pcsc_dynamic.patch is untested by anyone, not very beautiful looking. Also > it seems up to me to push to upstream, which I'm not totally confident about. As I mentioned in bug 612842 [0] (I just resent my reply now which never arrived), I think this patch in itself is a bad idea, so I'd say just drop it. [0] <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612842#49> thanks, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
