Your message dated Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:52:15 +0200
with message-id <4cb4761f.8060...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#598202: #598202 - update-manager-gnome: will not start
has caused the Debian Bug report #598202,
regarding update-manager-gnome: will not start
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
598202: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598202
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: update-manager-gnome
Version: 0.200.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
/usr/bin/update-manager
[ ERROR:UpdateManager.BugHandler] No exception handler installed.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/update-manager", line 37, in <module>
app = Application(APP_NAME, LOCALE_DIR, frontend='Gtk')
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/UpdateManager/Application.py", line 122,
in __init__
self._load_dist_specific(dist_specific)
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/UpdateManager/Application.py", line 193,
in _load_dist_specific
"dist_specific", DistBase)
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/UpdateManager/Application.py", line 240,
in _load_meta
obj = symbol(*module_args, **module_kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/UpdateManager/DistSpecific/Auto.py", line
32, in __init__
dist_name = get_distribution_name()
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/UpdateManager/Util/lsb.py", line 64, in
get_distribution_name
distribution_name = _invoke_lsb_release('-si')
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/UpdateManager/Util/lsb.py", line 56, in
_invoke_lsb_release
raise LSBError(err)
UpdateManager.Util.lsb.LSBError: lsb_release returned error: Traceback (most
recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/lsb_release", line 96, in <module>
main()
File "/usr/bin/lsb_release", line 60, in main
distinfo = lsb_release.get_distro_information()
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/lsb_release.py", line 271, in
get_distro_information
distinfo = guess_debian_release()
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/lsb_release.py", line 225, in
guess_debian_release
rinfo = guess_release_from_apt()
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/lsb_release.py", line 179, in
guess_release_from_apt
releases.sort(cmp = lambda x,y: RELEASES_ORDER.index(y[1]['suite']) -
RELEASES_ORDER.index(x[1]['suite']))
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/lsb_release.py", line 179, in <lambda>
releases.sort(cmp = lambda x,y: RELEASES_ORDER.index(y[1]['suite']) -
RELEASES_ORDER.index(x[1]['suite']))
ValueError: list.index(x): x not in list
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing-proposed-updates
APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500,
'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages update-manager-gnome depends on:
ii gconf2 2.28.1-4 GNOME configuration database syste
ii gksu 2.0.2-3 graphical frontend to su
ii python 2.6.6-3 interactive high-level object-orie
ii python-dbus 0.83.1-1 simple interprocess messaging syst
ii python-gconf 2.28.1-1 Python bindings for the GConf conf
ii python-gobject 2.21.4+is.2.21.3-1 Python bindings for the GObject li
ii python-gtk2 2.17.0-4 Python bindings for the GTK+ widge
ii python-support 1.0.10 automated rebuilding support for P
ii python-vte 1:0.24.3-1 Python bindings for the VTE widget
ii update-manager-core 0.200.4-1 APT update manager core functional
update-manager-gnome recommends no packages.
Versions of packages update-manager-gnome suggests:
ii software-properties-gtk 0.60.debian-1.1 manage the repositories that you i
ii update-notifier 0.99.3debian6 Daemon which notifies about packag
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 10/11/2010 11:02 PM, w.talbot wrote:
> On 10/10/2010 07:24 AM, Evgeni Golov wrote:
>> Hi Bill,
>>
>> I'm trying to reproduce your bug with update-manager, but I can't :(
>> I have a freshly installed Squeeze and update-manager starts fine.
>> Looking at your mail, you seem to have added testing-proposed-updates
>> and unstable to your sources.list, so did I, u-m still works.
>>
>> Could you please post the output of `lsb_release -a`, the contents of
>> your /etc/apt/sources.list and the output of `apt-cache policy`?
>>
>> Regards
>> Evgeni
>>
>>
>>
> Hi Evgeni
>
> Thank you for your interest and your hard work but it appear that an
> update took care of the problem thanks to you and your team. However you
> mention my sources list // should I be using something different then
> testing-proposes-updates.
There is no problem with t-p-u, it was just and thought from me that
u-m-g fails to handle t-p-u.
I'm closing this now, feel free to reopen when you find a way to
reproduce it again.
--- End Message ---
