> When not respecting recommends, you cannot expect package to work > "out of the box" but will need some hand-tuning to get working. I never install Recommends on my Debian machines (servers, desktop, laptop). It's the first time I encounter such problems.
> Do you dare say that it is not possible - with hand-tuning - to get > some parts of sympa working when ca-certificates is not around? If I install SYMPA I expect that *all* parts works (not only 3 daemons among 4). > I strongly suspect that even without changing a single line in sympa > configuration files, but only using some openssl command to generate > a certificate and a crl file for it, sympa can run fine. > > Do you not agree with that? No, AFAIK this CA file (which expects to be a bundle of root CA certificates) is also used by SYMPA to redistribute S/MIME encrypted messages sent by subscribers[1]. I still don't understand why I should install a Recommend which is needed to get a basic setup working. The funny thing is that SYMPA depends on perl-suid and libfcgi-perl which should probably be ‘Recommends’. As a SYMPA maintainer, it's a bit sad that I can't fix something I consider to be a bug. Jonas, I don't want to fight with you about this. It seems that I can't convince you. I prefer to focus on the other bugs to fix. M. [1] http://www.sympa.org/manual/x509 -- Emmanuel Bouthenot mail: kol...@{openics,debian}.org gpg: 4096R/0x929D42C3 xmpp: kol...@im.openics.org irc: kol...@{freenode,oftc} -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org