On Thu, 13 May 2010 04:28:27 +0400, sergio <mail...@sergio.spb.ru> wrote: > On 05/13/2010 04:05 AM, Bdale Garbee wrote: > > > You assert that there is a policy violation where there is none, and > > I've already explained how you can achieve a trivial resolution of the > > behavior that bothers you with the existing packages. > > In the Debian policy I see: > /var/run and /var/lock may be mounted as temporary filesystems[59], so > the init.d scripts must handle this correctly. > > "... _must_ handle ..." > > And sudo doesn't handle this correctly. So it's policy violation. > Where I'm wrong?
Our difference of opinion is over whether showing the lecture every time is a failure or just an expected behavior when choosing to use RAMRUN. However, after re-reading the FHS sections on the various /var subdirs, I now believe that /var/lib may be a better location for the state information to reside in than /var/run. I'll raise this question with sudo upstream. Bdale
pgpWOJdGWj9bU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
